Switch the library to ArrayRef#415
Merged
Dirreke merged 4 commits intorust-ndarray:masterfrom Dec 29, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #415 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 87.65% 87.35% -0.31%
==========================================
Files 65 65
Lines 3895 3937 +42
==========================================
+ Hits 3414 3439 +25
- Misses 481 498 +17 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Dirreke
approved these changes
Dec 26, 2025
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a large PR that repeatedly does a simple process: find locations of
&ArrayBaseand replace it with&ArrayRef, then remove any unused generics. The only change that isn't in this theme is forEigGeneralized, for which we need a new trait to provide a tuple-friendly implementation (see #412 for more details).Closes #412